AI support for ORKG

ChatGPT is a conversational AI interface powered by the large language model (LLM) GPT-3.5 to generate responses as natural language text, code, or tables based on human-supplied prompts designed as questions or instructions. Its ability to generate tables when cleverly prompted is a feature that can be tapped into by ORKG users as an assistant to create their research comparisons.

The user has a starting set of papers to compare and wants suggestions for properties to compare the contributions in the papers by.

Prompt

Response

Here ChatGPT identified the Basic Reproduction Number (R0) property as the relevant comparison theme of the three paper contributions. The rest of the properties, however, are too vague, therefore undesirable to creating an ORKG research comparison.

Generally, an ORKG research comparison should based on a common research problem, which in this case is the Covid-19 reproduction number (R0) estimate, that unites the remaining properties as a theme. Based on this one property, the user can create a mental map of which other properties around the R0 estimate are relevant to describe fully as a structured research comparison an overview of the contributions. The next example elaborates this use-case.

The user has a starting set of papers to compare and a starting set of properties to compare the contributions in the papers by.

Prompt

Response

There is more than one way to write a prompt. Here is another example.

Prompt

Response

These comparisons are nearly 80% close to the final desirable ORKG Researh Comparison on the research problem of the Covid-19 R0 estimate which can be viewed here. With the ChatGPT result as a reference, the ORKG user is now equipped with the relevant information on data to create a structured ORKG research comparison.

This comparison is created based on the knowledge base of the LLM which is not necessarily derived from the content of scholarly articles. Since the ORKG research comparisons are for scholarly articles, it is necessary to include in the prompt to ChatGPT the text of the article from which the research comparison can be created. Thus the above result is undesirable as an ORKG research comparison of the content described in scholarly articles.

In the case of what constitutes ideal context to prompt the model with, it is recommended to start with the article title and abstract. In case of undesirable results, additional sections of the article such as few lines from the Introduction, or Results, or Conclusions can also be tried.

Prompt

Response

Follow-up Prompt

Response

For problems that are well-known and extensively discussed in the community, ChatGPT works very well in creating structured comparisons and offering citations of related works as scholarly publications that are its knowledge sources. In this case, the cited articles 2 and 4 were the ones that introduced the models and that could be included as contribution items in an ORKG comparison.

A small caveat on the need to include enough context from scholarly articles in the prompt to ChatGPT to obtain an accurate set of properties to create ORKG comparisons. There maybe exceptions to this rule if the theme is one that is popular and known to be widely discussed in the community. This example on the theme of transformer language models is a case-in-point. Compare the ChatGPT result above with the ORKG Research Comparison that catalogs 60 different LLMs here. The ORKG comparison is based on the following properties: model name, model family, pretraining architecture, pretraining task, extension, application,date created, number of parameters, training corpus, organization, has source code, and blog post. Comparing these properties with the ChatGPT response, we find that ChatGPT offered an accurate, albeit less detailed, response on the comparable properties of transformer models. The ORKG user could have easily based their work on the properties recommended by ChatGPT to create an ORKG comparison on this widely discussed theme of transformer models.

It is recommended to observe caution with using ChatGPT as it can hallucinate information which if integrated without verification in the ORKG can lead to the problem of misinformation.

An important aspect of structuring contributions about machine learning models are the results obtained by the models. Such information is vital to the ORKG Benchmarks feature that compares the performances of machine learning models in Leaderboards. Sometimes a user might find it tedious to scour through the entire paper to find the model results, in particular if the work is not theirs. In which case, ChatGPT might potentially be leveraged as an assistant as in the case below.

Unfortunately, in this case, we were not so lucky with the result as everything in the ChatGPT response from the model names to the scores reported are hallucinated or made up. The following screen shows a follow-up prompt where we we probed the model to cite the source article whose title was used in the original prompt.

It was observed that, aside from getting the venue of the publication right, again the list of authors and the publication date are hallucinated or made-up information.

Researchers at the moment speculate that large LLMs may simply be learning heuristics, via an internal, statistics-driven process, that are out of reach for those with fewer parameters or lower-quality data which means drive their impressive capabilites. Thus models like ChatGPT, albeit very convincing, cannot be relied on 100% in performing desired tasks. In other words, the model pitfalls are it can be veered incorrectly based on the statistical patterns it accrued. Nevertheless, as demonstrated in the other examples above, it can indeed be a nice assistant to the ORKG user to create ORKG research comparisons.

Finally, here are some question suggestions that users can pose to ChatGPT to help them get started with the process of conceptualizing an ORKG research comparison.

For more examples of prompts showing how ChatGPT can assist with ORKG content creation, we recommend reading the following Medium article Structured Scholarly Knowledge - ChatGPT Prompts You Need.

You can recognize the availability of ChatGPT support by the green lightbulb button, as displayed below.

Since ChatGPT provides you smart suggestions, we called the suggestion box Smart suggestions. The Smart suggestions box looks always similar, which you can see below.

The Explanation provides a short description what the suggestions are taking as input and what is the provided output. The Suggestions themselves are listed below. The Help button takes you to this page. The Reload button is helpful in case you want to get different suggestions. This can also be helpful if for some reason the suggestions aren’t displayed correct. Finally, Feedback is giving you the opportunity to provide feedback about the specific suggestions. This is very important for us, as it helps us to further improve the ChatGPT integrations. Below, you can see how the feedback form can be filled out.

Your feedback is very valuable for us, so would like to ask you to actively fill out the feedback form when using this functionality. It is very helpful if you provide feedback multiple times, as each case is different.

As mentioned before, ChatGPT is integrated in a similar manner throughout the ORKG website. However, the suggestions themselves are very different. In total, we created 6 use cases where ChatGPT is used. In the future, we hope to add additional use cases. Below the use cases are explained in more detail.